Father v. Couple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal court challenge to superior 4 || court judgment about child custody and marital assets barred by Rooker-Feldman
• affirming dismissal of the case “because the complaint is nothing more than 5 another attack on the California superior court’s determination in [the plaintiff’s] domestic 6 case.”
• affirming the district court's dismissal of the case 23 “because the complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California superior court's determination in [the plaintiff's] domestic case”
• affirming the district court’s dismissal 26 of the case “because the complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California 27 superior court’s determination in [the plaintiff’s] domestic case”
• affirming the district court's dismissal of the case 19 “because the complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California superior court's 20 determination in [the plaintiff's] domestic case”
• affirming the district court’s dismissal of the case 18 “because the complaint is nothing more than another attack on the California superior court’s 19 determination in [the plaintiff’s] domestic case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).