Skip to main content
· 9/27/1990

Fate McMiller v. A.L. Lockhart, Director Adc

Citations

  • 915 F.2d 368
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17154
  • 1990 WL 139472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a habeas petitioner's due process claim founded on denial of a motion for continuance of his criminal trial was judged against \fundamental fairness\ and \abuse of discretion\ standards, in light of the circumstances of the case
  • a habeas petitioner’s due process claim founded on denial of a motion for continuance of his criminal trial was judged against “fundamental fairness” and “abuse of discretion” standards, in light of the circumstances of the case
  • a habeas petitioner’s due process claim founded on denial of a motion for continuance of his criminal trial was judged against “fundamental fairness” and “abuse of discretion” standards, in light of the circumstances of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.