· 7/1/1867
Fassett v. Geyer
Citations
- 55 Me. 160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing common-law nuisance suit brought two months after TCEQ issued citation for Category 5 odor violation
- “Evidence that no one disputes does not necessarily establish a fact as a matter of law.”
- “a business owner’s conclusory or speculative testimony of lost profits will not support a judgment”
- evaluating evidence presented regarding both pre- and post-damage market value
- noting opinion is speculative if based on guesswork or conjecture
- a property owner’s opinion “must be substantiated”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Cutting, Dickerson, Tapley, Walton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.