Skip to main content
· 7/1/1867

Fassett v. Geyer

Citations

  • 55 Me. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing common-law nuisance suit brought two months after TCEQ issued citation for Category 5 odor violation
  • “Evidence that no one disputes does not necessarily establish a fact as a matter of law.”
  • “a business owner’s conclusory or speculative testimony of lost profits will not support a judgment”
  • evaluating evidence presented regarding both pre- and post-damage market value
  • noting opinion is speculative if based on guesswork or conjecture
  • a property owner’s opinion “must be substantiated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Cutting, Dickerson, Tapley, Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.