Skip to main content
· 11/21/2012

Farzam v. Isaacson

Citations

  • 905 F. Supp. 2d 95
  • 2012 WL 5873676
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Due to this transfer, this Court will not consider facts concerning the breach of the settlement agreement as a basis for retaliation because such facts are based on ‘substantially the same operative facts’ as the breach-of-contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.