· 11/21/2012
Farzam v. Isaacson
Citations
- 905 F. Supp. 2d 95
- 2012 WL 5873676
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Due to this transfer, this Court will not consider facts concerning the breach of the settlement agreement as a basis for retaliation because such facts are based on ‘substantially the same operative facts’ as the breach-of-contract claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Rosemary M. Collyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.