Skip to main content
· 7/2/1904

Farwell v. Colman

Citations

  • 35 Wash. 308
  • 77 P. 379
  • 1904 Wash. LEXIS 451

Syllabus

<p>Attorney and Client •— Contract for Services — Abandonment — Failure to Prosecute Action — Termination oe Employment. In an action to recover for services performed by an attorney under a special agreement to receive seven per cent of the amount recovered for the defendant upon the final judgment in a condemnation proceeding instituted by a railroad company, in which it appears that a judgment for the defendant for $9,500 was reversed by the supreme court for error, and a new trial ordered, and that the defendant repeatedly requested the attorney to proceed with the case, but he failed to do so for over ten years, giving as a reason that owing to the hard times the company would abandon the suit if pressed, and that he would thereby lose his fee, such refusal was a termination of the employment, justifying the defendant in making any settlement with the railroad company, and warranting a finding that nothing was due the attorney under the terms of his special contract of employment.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.