· 3/7/1980
Farwell Construction Co. v. Ticktin
Citations
- 405 N.E.2d 1051
- 84 Ill. App. 3d 791
- 39 Ill. Dec. 916
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- significant differences in the amount sought versus the amount awarded indicate that the amount was not easily ascertainable
- real estate sales contract qualifies as “instrument of writing” under statute, so interest may be awarded if damages could be determined with sufficient pre- cision
- denial of interest was not abuse of discretion where “contract price was sharply disputed” and market value “was also disputable”
- denial of interest was not abuse of discretion where “contract price was sharply disputed” and market value “was also disputable”
- real estate sales contract qualifies as “instrument of writing” under statute, so interest may be awarded if damages could be determined with sufficient pre- cision
- contra proferentem is a “last resort” rule of contract construction employed only where the court cannot ascertain the meaning of contract provisions under any other interpretive approach
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.