Skip to main content
· 3/7/1980

Farwell Construction Co. v. Ticktin

Citations

  • 405 N.E.2d 1051
  • 84 Ill. App. 3d 791
  • 39 Ill. Dec. 916
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 2973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • significant differences in the amount sought versus the amount awarded indicate that the amount was not easily ascertainable
  • real estate sales contract qualifies as “instrument of writing” under statute, so interest may be awarded if damages could be determined with sufficient pre- cision
  • denial of interest was not abuse of discretion where “contract price was sharply disputed” and market value “was also disputable”
  • denial of interest was not abuse of discretion where “contract price was sharply disputed” and market value “was also disputable”
  • real estate sales contract qualifies as “instrument of writing” under statute, so interest may be awarded if damages could be determined with sufficient pre- cision
  • contra proferentem is a “last resort” rule of contract construction employed only where the court cannot ascertain the meaning of contract provisions under any other interpretive approach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.