Farris v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though complaint alleged that an employee’s acts were committed at the employers’ direction, coverage was appropriate because the jury could still have held the employer vicariously liable
• even though complaint alleged that an employee's acts were committed at the employers' direction, coverage was appropriate because the jury could still have held the employer vicariously liable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).