Farris v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the loss of job and salary, without more, was insufficient to establish irreparable injury
• noting that the “D.C. Circuit . . . has not yet adopted or, for that matter, rejected th[e] rule” requiring a movant who seeks a mandatory injunction to meet a higher standard than in the ordinary case
• noting that the “D.C. Circuit . . . has not yet adopted or, for that matter, rejected th[e] rule” requiring a movant who seeks a mandatory injunction to meet a higher standard than in the ordinary case
• finding \compelling and insurmountable the institutional harm attendant to judicial interference with federal personnel actions\
• denying injunctive relief on failure to demonstrate irreparable harm without analysis of the other factors
• denying injunctive relief on failure to demonstrate irreparable harm without analysis of the other factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).