Skip to main content
· 6/29/1943

Farrington v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 59 Cal. App. 2d 468
  • 139 P.2d 80
  • 1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no conversion action exists where the plaintiff consented to the removal of his personal property
  • holding that no conversion action exists where the plaintiff consented to the removal of his personal property
  • holding that no conversion action exists where the plaintiff consented to the removal of his personal property
  • holding that no conversion action exists where the plaintiff consented to the removal of his personal property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.