Farren v. Fuks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts must give great deference to the decisions of prison officials relating to the administration of the facility
• holding that under the 20 Due Process Clause, a detainee may not be punished prior to conviction
• holding that in the prison context, visual body cavity searches do not violate the Fourth Amendment
• holding that due process requires a finding of guilt prior to punishment
• stating that the practice of strip and visual body cavity searches \instinctively gives us the most pause\
• deciding whether the challenged conditions amount to \punishment that may not constitutionally be inflicted upon [pre-trial] detainees qua detainees\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).