Farrell v. U.S. Army Brigadier Gen.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Defendant’s] glassy, bloodshot eyes and slurred speech alone created a strong suspicion that [defendant] might be impaired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Myers-McNeil
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-11-20· cited 4×
• St. John v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-05-02

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stone v. Powell
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
• Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
• Davis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
• United States v. Janis
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
• Grady v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 2015-03-30· cited 197×
• Pooler v. Motor Vehicles Division
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-06-07· cited 75×
• Olson v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-08-02· cited 74×
• State v. Lussier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-28· cited 72×
• United States v. Wilson
  Second Circuit· 2012-10-25· cited 33×
• People v. McCowen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-03-01· cited 7×
• State v. Nickerson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-05-10· cited 2×

Other cases named Farrell v. U.S. Army Brigadier Gen.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Farrell v. U.S. Army Brigadier Gen.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2016-08-18· cited 1×