· 4/15/1883
Farrell v. Union Trust Co.
Citations
- 77 Mo. 475
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding appointment and preparation of new counsel due to conflict of interest was neither party’s fault
- interpreting ten month delay as presumptively prejudicial
- interpreting ten month delay as presumptively prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.