Skip to main content
· 2/28/1997

Farrell v. Unified School District No. 229

Citations

  • 23 Kan. App. 2d 668
  • 937 P.2d 967
  • 1997 Kan. App. LEXIS 68

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that plaintiff could be placed in a one-person peer group because of his special skills
  • rejecting plaintiff’s “attempt to demonstrate a conflict in the reasons given for his layoff” based, in part, on statements “temporally remote from the challenged . . . layoff decision.”
  • “Even negligence in responding to a retirement plan participant’s request for plan documents constitutes breach of an ERISA fiduciary duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brazil, Elliott, Knudson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.