· 4/3/2001
Farrell v. Time Service, Inc.
Citations
- 178 F. Supp. 2d 1295
- 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1660
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11493
- 2001 WL 764466
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing negligent retention and supervision claim because plaintiff did not allege facts establishing the elements of the claim and because given that her termination claim was barred by the at-will employment doctrine, it could not serve as the underlying tort
- “It is clearly established that pregnancy per se does not constitute a disability under federal law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thrash
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.