Skip to main content
· 4/3/2001

Farrell v. Time Service, Inc.

Citations

  • 178 F. Supp. 2d 1295
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1660
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11493
  • 2001 WL 764466

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing negligent retention and supervision claim because plaintiff did not allege facts establishing the elements of the claim and because given that her termination claim was barred by the at-will employment doctrine, it could not serve as the underlying tort
  • “It is clearly established that pregnancy per se does not constitute a disability under federal law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thrash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.