Farrell v. State of NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “the State of New York and the New York State Bureau of Audit and Control are not the employers of the plaintiff, they may not be named as defendants to the Title VII action”
• dismissing a claim for “misfeasance and/or malfeasance” where the plaintiff failed to oppose the “dismissal of th[o]se ‘claims’”
• “Significant to the Court’s decision not to toll or waive the statutory requirement was the fact that ‘there [was] no proof that [plaintiff] made any attempt to procure such letter.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).