Farrell v. Schmidt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writing that a plaintiff pursuing a disparate treatment theory “can make an indirect showing of pretext with statistical evidence”
• writing that “[u]nder the disparate treatment theory, the thrust of plaintiffs ease is that, compared with other like-qualified applicants, plaintiff was treated differently because of his race”
• stating that “the court will not construct arguments or theories for the plaintiff in the absence of any discussion of those issues”
• noting that a court may not “construct arguments or theories for [a party] in the absence of any discussion of those issues”
• observing that a court may not “construct arguments or theories for the plaintiff in the absence of any discussion of those issues”
• stating that the Court is not required to interpret filings to “construct arguments or theories for the plaintiff in the absence of any discussion of those issues”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).