Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff offered no evidence to suggest a pattern of antagonism or of retaliatory motive that could give rise to an inference of retaliation
• “(4) her submission to the unwelcome advances was an express or implied condition for receiving job benefits or her refusal to submit resulted in tangible job detriment”
• \(4) her submission to the unwelcome advances was an express or implied condition for receiving job benefits or her refusal to submit resulted in tangible job detriment.\
• finding the timing not to be “unusually suggestive”
• reviewing Farrell’s quid pro quo claim
• finding the timing not to be \unusually suggestive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).