First Circuit· 6/23/1982
Farrell Ocean Services, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 681 F.2d 91
- 1983 A.M.C. 1077
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18028
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting Section 971, from which Section 31301 was derived, and finding “ ‘other necessaries’ [as used in Section 971] should be interpreted broadly in order to encourage the provision of services that will keep ships active.... ”
- “[A] qualifying ‘vessel’ is one that is capable of use as a vessel even if not functioning as such at the moment in question.”
- district court's findings on issue of waiver reviewable for clear error
- district court’s findings on issue, of waiver reviewable for clear error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell, Coffin, Fairchild
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Equilease Corp. v. M/V SampsonFifth Circuit· 1986-04-25· cited 120×
- Marcial Ucin, S.A. v. SS GaliciaFirst Circuit· 1983-12-14· cited 59×
- Navieros Inter-Americanos, S.A. v. M/V Vasilia ExpressFirst Circuit· 1997-07-28· cited 48×
- Gulf Oil Trading Co. v. M/V Caribe MarFifth Circuit· 1985-04-19· cited 48×
- Marine Coatings of Alabama, Inc. v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1986-07-09· cited 35×
- Puerto Rico Ports Authority v. Barge Katy-B, O.N. 606665First Circuit· 2005-10-25· cited 28×
- Bermuda Express v. Litsa Ex. LaurieThird Circuit· 1989-05-09· cited 18×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 13×
- Trico Marine Operators, Inc. v. Falcon Drilling Co.Fifth Circuit· 1997-06-30· cited 11×
- Port of Portland v. ParallaNinth Circuit· 1989-12-27· cited 11×
- Tramp Oil & Marine Ltd. v. M/V MERMAID ID. Puerto Rico· 1986-02-06· cited 10×
- Ryan-Walsh, Inc. v. M/V OCEAN TRADERD. Maryland· 1996-03-25· cited 7×
- Skandinaviska-Enskilda Banken v. C.L.C. Marine Services, Ltd. (In Re SeaEscape Cruises, Ltd.)S.D. Florida· 1994-09-30· cited 7×
- Chi Shun Hua Steel Co., Ltd. v. Crest Tankers, Inc.D. New Hampshire· 1989-02-28· cited 6×
- Maine Uniform Rental, Inc. v. Nova Star M/VFirst Circuit· 2017-11-07· cited 5×
- Mullane v. ChambersD. Massachusetts· 2004-12-22· cited 4×
- Marcial Ucin, S.A. v. SS GaliciaD. Massachusetts· 1983-01-05· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseFirst Circuit· 1983-12-14· cited 2×
- USL Capital Ex Rel. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. the New York 30D. Massachusetts· 1996-11-15· cited 2×
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. M/V Tyson LykesFourth Circuit· 1995-10-16· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Point Landing, Inc., Intervenor v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding CompanyFifth Circuit· 1958-11-21· cited 104×
- W. A. Marshall & Co. v. S. S. \President Arthur\Supreme Court· 1929-05-20· cited 62×
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court· 1970-12-21· cited 50×
- Wirth Limited and Hoesch Siegerlandwerke A. G. Siegen v. S/s Acadia Forest and Lash Barge No. Cg-204, Eurogulf Lines D/B/A Central Gulf Contramar LineFifth Circuit· 1976-08-30· cited 39×
- The EverosaFirst Circuit· 1937-12-08· cited 35×
- Nacirema Operating Co., Inc. v. SS Al KulsumS.D. New York· 1975-12-16· cited 13×
- M/v Marifax, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., Lcu 682, and Island Dredging, Limited v. Thomas J. McCroryFifth Circuit· 1968-03-25· cited 12×
- The BronxSecond Circuit· 1917-11-13· cited 12×
- The A. S. ShermanN.D. New York· 1930-11-07· cited 8×
- Lower Coast Transp. Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Fifth Circuit· 1914-02-03· cited 6×
- Farrell Ocean Services, Inc. v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 1981-09-24· cited 5×
- Adolph Ajubita and A. W. Short, Jerry Fitzpatrick, Intervenor-Appellant v. S/s Peik, Its Engines, Etc.Fifth Circuit· 1970-07-07· cited 4×
- Atlantic & Southern Nav. Co. v. Central Wharf Towboat Co.First Circuit· 1924-06-12· cited 4×
Other cases named Farrell Ocean Services, Inc. v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.