Skip to main content
· 3/15/1877

Farrar v. Duncan

Citations

  • 29 La. Ann. 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim challenging jury instruction concerning prior sexual misconduct given at close of evidence did not relate back to claim alleged in original petition challenging only the admissibility at trial of evidence of that conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.