Skip to main content
· 5/16/1910

Farra v. State Board of Agriculture

Citations

  • 138 Ky. 346
  • 128 S.W. 79
  • 1910 Ky. LEXIS 79

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing separately whether the discovery rule or fraudulent concealment was adequately pled, and applying heightened requirements only to the claim of fraudulent concealment
  • distinguishing between fraudulent concealment doctrine embodied in § 5-203 and common-law discovery rule
  • “A claim of civil conspiracy . . . shares a statute of limitations with the underlying tort.”
  • “[F]actual determinations [as to the date of accrual] are generally made by the trier of fact and are not decided by the court as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.