Farr v. West End Improvement Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim was previously made without prejudice as to the defendant upon whom a direct benefit was not pled
• finding that because “the plaintiffs purchased their appliances from the retailer-defendants, not from Whirlpool, they did not confer a sufficiently direct benefit on Whirlpool[,]” and as such the unjust enrichment claim could not proceed against Whirlpool

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).