Skip to main content
· 3/16/1908

Farr v. Emuy

Citations

  • 121 La. 91
  • 46 So. 112
  • 1908 La. LEXIS 638

Syllabus

<p>Divorce — Custody oe Children.</p> <p>The husband, having obtained judgment of final divorce awarding him the unconditional custody of the minor children of the marriage, is without legal capacity to abdicate his trust by . a subsequent agreement with his divorced wife; and such an agreement, purporting to vest in her the temporary or conclitional custody of the children, cannot operate as a bar to his recovering possession of them.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Agencies can moot claims against them by promulgating new rules that cure previous procedural defects . . . .”
  • “The Court concludes that OTA’s complaint against the Delay Rules is moot and no longer presents an Article III case or controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monroe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.