Farr v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an attorney who engages in prohibited communications violates the attorney’s ethical duty to obey the obligations of the tribunal.”
• explaining that “a district court has 13 the primary responsibility for controlling the conduct of the attorneys who practice before it.”
• noting that when invoking its 22 inherent power, a court must exercise discretion in fashioning an appropriate sanction
• noting that courts may disqualify experts in possession of confidential information who \switch sides\
• noting the court’s discretion under its 9 | inherent power to fashion an appropriate sanction
• remanding a case for sanctions and a new trial because the defense attorney offered a monetary inducement, engagement in another case, to an opposing expert prior to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).