Farr & Co. v. Cia. Intercontinental De Navegacion De Cuba, S. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 4(c) was “clearly not intended” to limit the provision allowing parties to serve in a manner prescribed by state law
• holding that the plaintiff did not waive its right to arbitration when it filed suit because “the libel never got beyond the initial stage of filing; no party was served or entered appearance; no property was attached, no answer filed”
• holding a plaintiff did not waive its right to arbitrate because the suit “never got beyond the initial stage of filing; no party was served or entered appearance; no property was attached, no answer filed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).