Skip to main content
E.D. Michigan· 5/14/1987

Farquhar v. Shelden

Citations

  • 116 F.R.D. 70
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant, a citizen of the Netherlands, was entitled to a protective order requiring plaintiff to take his deposition in the Netherlands
  • noting that “a party seeking discovery must go where the desired witnesses are normally located”
  • noting that “case law indicates that it will be presumed that the defendant will be examined at his residence or place of business or employment”
  • “While the location of the parties themselves is a primary factor, locations of their attorneys is also a relevant consideration”
  • “A subpoena is not necessary if the person to be examined is a party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Binder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.