E.D. Michigan· 5/14/1987
Farquhar v. Shelden
Citations
- 116 F.R.D. 70
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant, a citizen of the Netherlands, was entitled to a protective order requiring plaintiff to take his deposition in the Netherlands
- noting that “a party seeking discovery must go where the desired witnesses are normally located”
- noting that “case law indicates that it will be presumed that the defendant will be examined at his residence or place of business or employment”
- “While the location of the parties themselves is a primary factor, locations of their attorneys is also a relevant consideration”
- “A subpoena is not necessary if the person to be examined is a party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Binder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Outsidewall Tire LitigationE.D. Virginia· 2010-05-04· cited 52×
- Turner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaM.D. North Carolina· 1988-03-18· cited 24×
- United States v. One Gulfstream G-V Jet Aircraft Displaying Tail Number VPCESDistrict of Columbia· 2014-05-09· cited 19×
- Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-02-05· cited 17×
- United States v. $160,066.98 from Bank of AmericaS.D. California· 2001-07-05· cited 13×
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Worldwide Insurance Management Corp.N.D. Texas· 1992-12-08· cited 12×
- In Re HondaD. Hawaii· 1989-10-05· cited 4×
- Insulation Unlimited, Inc. v. Two J's Properties, Ltd.Miami County Court of Common Pleas· 1997-11-26· cited 3×
- Yaskawa Electric Corp. v. Kollmorgen Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2001-06-07· cited 3×
- Undraitis v. LukaN.D. Indiana· 1992-08-18· cited 2×
- Payton v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.N.D. Georgia· 1993-04-22· cited 2×
- OKADA VS. DIST. C T. (WYNN RESORTS, LTD.)Nevada Supreme Court· 2015-10-15
- Pennington v. CuprumNorthampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1996-07-02
- Haleck v. TRT, Inc.High Court of American Samoa· 2003-09-23
- Arabi Gin Co. v. Plexus Cotton, Ltd. (In re Joseph Walker & Co.)D. South Carolina· 2012-04-13
- Estate of Yael Botvin v. Heideman, Nudelman & Kalik, P.C.District of Columbia· 2025-07-10
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Susie J. Salter, as of the Estate of Salter, Rufus, Deceased v. The Upjohn Company, a CorporationFifth Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 186×
- Hyam v. American Export Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 1954-05-06· cited 38×
- Terry v. Modern WoodmenW.D. Missouri· 1972-10-24· cited 28×
- Haymes v. Columbia Pictures Corp.S.D. New York· 1954-08-02· cited 16×
- Huynh v. WerkeS.D. Ohio· 1981-05-29· cited 15×
- Work v. BierDistrict of Columbia· 1985-10-28· cited 13×
- National Bank of Detroit v. SheldenSixth Circuit· 1984-03-08· cited 12×
- General Leasing Co. v. Lawrence Photo-Graphic Supply, Inc.W.D. Missouri· 1979-10-31· cited 11×
- Dunn v. Standard Fire InsuranceE.D. Tennessee· 1981-10-09· cited 6×
- Yannitelli v. Navieras De Puerto RicoS.D. New York· 1984-11-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.