· 4/26/2017
Farnworth v. Rossetto
Citations
- 285 Or. App. 10
- 396 P.3d 272
- 2017 WL 1489034
- 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 533
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Secretary “defines ‘corroboration’ far too narrowly” in interpreting requirement in 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f
- concluding that corroboration of claimed in-service stressor does not require corroboration of every detail, including appellant’s personal participation in identifying process
- holding that Secretary “defines ‘corroboration’ far too narrowly” in interpreting 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)
- holding that Secretary \defines 'corroboration' far too narrowly\ in interpreting 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)
- \VA is bound to follow the controlling precedential decisions of this Court . . . .\
- \VA is bound to follow the controlling precedential decisions of this Court.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.