Skip to main content
· 4/26/2017

Farnworth v. Rossetto

Citations

  • 285 Or. App. 10
  • 396 P.3d 272
  • 2017 WL 1489034
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Secretary “defines ‘corroboration’ far too narrowly” in interpreting requirement in 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f
  • concluding that corroboration of claimed in-service stressor does not require corroboration of every detail, including appellant’s personal participation in identifying process
  • holding that Secretary “defines ‘corroboration’ far too narrowly” in interpreting 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)
  • holding that Secretary \defines 'corroboration' far too narrowly\ in interpreting 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)
  • \VA is bound to follow the controlling precedential decisions of this Court . . . .\
  • \VA is bound to follow the controlling precedential decisions of this Court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.