Skip to main content
· 3/24/1938

Farnsworth v. Hunter

Citations

  • 11 Cal. 2d 27
  • 77 P.2d 840
  • 1938 Cal. LEXIS 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It cannot be said that appellant was prejudiced by the fact that[,] in order to establish inadequacy of consideration as a defense to specific performance, she was compelled to show a high value of the property and thus prove, by her own evidence, plaintiffs’ right to damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waste

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.