· 3/5/1928
Farnsworth v. Central Sav. Bank
Citations
- 24 F.2d 896
- 58 App. D.C. 68
- 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that trial court does not have discretion to ignore UTCRs using mandatory language of “shall”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.