Farnsworth v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Finding that a hypothetical question is fair if it informs the vocational expert of what the claimant’s abilities and limitations are, even if every limitation is not listed
• finding no need to re-contact the consultative examiner where he failed to note the claimant’s degree of limitation, but his objective findings showed no limitations
• “In making his or her findings, an A.L.J. must explicitly indicate the weight given to all of the relevant evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).