Skip to main content
· 4/3/1916

Farnham v. United States

Citations

  • 240 U.S. 537
  • 36 S. Ct. 427
  • 60 L. Ed. 786
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1481

Syllabus

<p>Where the officers of the United States charged with the matter have refused the offer of a patentee for the use of his invention, and have declined to use it, and, proceeding independently, make and use articles designed by themselves, which the patentee claims embody his invention, there is no implied contract on the part of the Government to pay for the use of the invention; in the absence of such contract the Court of Claims could not take cognizance of the claim of an inventor for infringement of his patent prior to the passage of the act of June 25, 1910.</p> <p>While the petitions in this case must be dismissed because the claims are based on an implied contract which has not been proved, the judgment of dismissal should be without prejudice to claimant’s right to present his claim for infringement of his patent under the Act of June 25, 1910, c. 423, 36 Stat. 851.</p> <p>49 Ct. Cl. 19, affirmed.</p>

Judges: Hughes, McReynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.