· 1/8/2009
Farnam v. Walker
Citations
- 593 F. Supp. 2d 1000
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2781
- 2009 WL 103353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the public had an 6 interest in the maintenance of prisoner’s health during the pendency of the lawsuit
- holding that 16 the public had an interest in the maintenance of prisoner’s health during the pendency of 17 the lawsuit
- “[N]othing in § 3626 prohibits the entry of successive orders for preliminary injunction if needed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harold A. Baker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.