Skip to main content
· 1/8/2009

Farnam v. Walker

Citations

  • 593 F. Supp. 2d 1000
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2781
  • 2009 WL 103353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the public had an 6 interest in the maintenance of prisoner’s health during the pendency of the lawsuit
  • holding that 16 the public had an interest in the maintenance of prisoner’s health during the pendency of 17 the lawsuit
  • “[N]othing in § 3626 prohibits the entry of successive orders for preliminary injunction if needed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harold A. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.