Farnam v. U.S. Sugar Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the JCC did not err in rejecting the parties’ stipulation because competent, substantial evidence supported a contrary finding
• holding that the JCC did not err in rejecting the parties' stipulation because competent, substantial evidence supported a contrary finding
• holding that JCC could reject parties’ stipulation where competent, substantial evidence supported a contrary finding
• holding “JCC erred in addressing whether repetitive trauma caused, to any degree, the low back condition” because JCC “found the claim was not ripe for adjudication”
• holding JCC entitled to reject parties’ stipulation where CSE supports contrary: finding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).