Farmers' National Bank v. Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• calling a comparison of the CFPB to the FHFA “mix[ing] apples with oranges”
• “Without [a] showing [of actual harm], the Plaintiffs could put themselves in a better place than otherwise warranted.”
• “a nexus between the desire to remove and the challenged actions taken by the insulated actor” can prove harm
• “Even among self-funded agencies, the [CFPB] is unique” because its “perpetual self-directed, double-insulated funding structure goes a significant step further than that enjoyed by the other agencies on offer.”
• “[A]fter Collins, a party challenging agency action must show not only that the removal restriction transgresses the Constitution’s separation of powers but also that the unconstitutional provision caused (or would cause) them harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).