Farmers & Merchants Mutual Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the Commission could properly conclude that the conference calling companies were not end users under the tariff, tariffed services are not at issue.”
• “The Commission has long instructed that .a service that does not ‘fall within the plain meaning’ of the tariff is not governed by the tariff whether or not it is ‘functionally similar’ to a tariffed service”
• \The [FCC] has long instructed that a service that does not 'fall within the plain meaning' of the tariff is not governed by the tariff whether or not it is 'functionally similar' to a tariffed service.\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).