Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Roberta Hodges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Bennett v. Hardy, 113 Wn.2d 912, 784 P.2d 1258 (1990)
• “RCW 48.01.030 may properly be read as a broad 23 statement of public policy supporting specific provisions of the insurance code, not as 24 1 an additional and separate statutory cause of action.”
• “[J]ust as this court 3 has limited bad-faith tort claims to the context of the insurer-insured relationship, so has it 4 limited CPA claims based on breach of the statutory duty of good faith.”
• “[J]ust as this court has 1 limited bad-faith tort claims to the context of the insurer-insured relationship, so 2 has it limited CPA claims based on breach of the statutory duty of good faith.” 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).