Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Fire Insurance v. Hutzler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer “was wrong to deny coverage to the [insured] without assessing the avenues for recovery under the common law that [may be] pursue[d]”
• recognizing merely that the relevant statute was inapplicable to the appellants — owners of property where alcohol was served — because the statute only applied to sellers of alcohol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).