Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Kurzmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that insurer’s agent “expressed her understanding that [the insurer] was obligated to provide the stated coverage”
• noting that “[a]n insurer is free to define or limit the scope of coverage as long as the policy language . . . is not in contravention of public policy” and that the exclusion of benefits mandated by the no-fault act renders such an exclusion void
• “Ambiguities in a contract generally raise questions of fact for the jury[.]”
• “Ambiguities in a contract generally raise questions of fact for the jury[.]”
• “Ambiguities in a contract generally raise questions of fact for the jury[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).