Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Oliver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, despite 4|| physical absence, a child was still a resident of his parent’s household because the child’s 5 || stay with his grandparents was only temporary
• considering the “individuals presence in, or absence from, the named insured’s home on the date of the occurrence” in determining residency status
• “ ‘resident of [the policyholder’s] household,’ on its face and as applied, is not ambiguous, and thus, must be interpreted according to its ordinary meaning;” the court then considered the subjective intent of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).