Skip to main content
· 2/13/1917

Farmers Fertilizer Co. v. Ruh

Citations

  • 7 Ohio App. 430
  • 29 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 165
  • 29 Ohio C.A. 165
  • 1917 Ohio App. LEXIS 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The economic-loss rule generally prevents recovery in tort of damages for purely economic loss.”
  • “When a duty in tort exists, a party may recover in tort. When a duty is premised entirely upon the terms of a contract, a party may recover based upon breach of contract”
  • project owner could not evade the economic loss rule by suing a subcontractor in negligence; owner had to sue the general contractor for breach of contract and the general contractor could in turn sue the subcontractor
  • barring litigants from recovering in tort for “purely economic losses”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allread, Ferneding, Kunkle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.