· 2/13/1917
Farmers Fertilizer Co. v. Ruh
Citations
- 7 Ohio App. 430
- 29 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 165
- 29 Ohio C.A. 165
- 1917 Ohio App. LEXIS 369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The economic-loss rule generally prevents recovery in tort of damages for purely economic loss.”
- “When a duty in tort exists, a party may recover in tort. When a duty is premised entirely upon the terms of a contract, a party may recover based upon breach of contract”
- project owner could not evade the economic loss rule by suing a subcontractor in negligence; owner had to sue the general contractor for breach of contract and the general contractor could in turn sue the subcontractor
- barring litigants from recovering in tort for “purely economic losses”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allread, Ferneding, Kunkle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.