Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co. v. Union State Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hogs are not the proceeds of the feed they consume
• rejecting a creditor’s argument that, “although creative, stretches the [statutory] language ... beyond our interpretation guideposts”
• rejecting a creditor’s argument that, “although creative, stretches the [statutory] language . . . beyond our interpretation guideposts”
• describing PMSI as simply “a secured loan for the price of new collateral”
• “When construing a statute, we search for an interpretation that is sensible, workable, practical, and logical.”
• Article 9 interpretations should be “sensible, workable, practical and logical”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).