Farmer v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This 12 so-called ‘exhaustion requirement’ is intended to afford ‘the state courts a meaningful 13 opportunity to consider allegations of legal error’ before a federal habeas court may 14 review a prisoner's claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farmer v. Baldwin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-03-26· cited 11×
• Farmer v. Baldwin
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-04-29· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• O'Sullivan v. Boerckel
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
• Duncan v. Henry
  Supreme Court· 1995-01-23· cited 2,630×
• Baldwin v. Reese
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-02· cited 2,198×
• Vasquez v. Hillery
  Supreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
• State v. Balfour
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-07-05· cited 333×
• Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard Morgan
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-03-30· cited 164×
• Donald Ray Wells v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-07-07· cited 156×
• State v. Farmer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 46×
• James T. Lockheart v. Don Hulick, Warden, Illinois River Correctional Center
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-04-12· cited 16×