Farm Construction Services, Inc. v. Stephen D. Fudge and Gail L. Fudge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule did not strip the district court of its jurisdiction because it was a \technical\ defect that had been waived
• holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule did not strip the district court of its jurisdiction because it was a “technical” defect that had been waived
• holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule did not strip the district court of its jurisdiction because it was a “technical” defect that had been waived
• “This Circuit, following Link, has turned a ‘deaf ear’ to the plea that the sins of the attorney should not be visited upon the client.”
• “This Circuit, following Link, has turned a deaf ear to the plea that‘the sins of the attorney should not be visited upon the client.”
• “[W]e have consistently ‘turned a deaf ear to the plea that the sins of the attorney should not be visited upon the client.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).