Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an insurer's agent's interpretation of doubtful language in the policy binds the insurer, unless the interpretation is patently absurd
• an insurer’s agent’s interpretation of doubtful language in the policy binds the insurer, unless the interpretation is patently absurd
• agent's representative had authority to interpret contract unless interpretation was \patently absurd\
• agent's representative had authority to interpret contract unless interpretation was “patently absurd”
• This court has ruled many times that an estoppel must be pleaded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).