Farley v. Goode

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the doctrine to a dentist who treated patient for four years but failed to diagnose periodontal disease
• a dentist met the continuing obligation exception when he treated the same condition over a number of years
• “While at first blush [.Farley ] may seem appealing and helpful to plaintiff, it can be distinguished both factually and legally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).