Farley v. Continental Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the act requiring such insurance “did not have as its purpose protecting the insured from loss, but did have in mind the protection of the public against carrier-inflicted injuries”
• “an injured plaintiff who seeks recovery of damages out of the [insurance] policy amount is a sort of third party beneficiary of the contract between the carrier and the insurer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).