Skip to main content
· 7/5/1994

Farkas v. D'OCA

Citations

  • 857 F. Supp. 300
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9033
  • 1994 WL 371526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he - fact that both actions arise out of a similar set of circumstances is not sufficient justification for abstention where the claims are not concurrent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.