Skip to main content
· 9/27/1979

Faris v. Enberg

Citations

  • 97 Cal. App. 3d 309
  • 158 Cal. Rptr. 704
  • 211 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 277
  • 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between a situation where 15 one voluntarily receives a confidential disclosure as opposed to receiving an unsolicited submission 16 of an idea
  • upholding grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment on implied-in-fact contract claim
  • “An actionable 14 breach of confidence will arise when an idea, whether or not protectable, is offered to another in 15 confidence.”
  • plaintiff submitted his format for a sports-themed television quiz show to defendant, not for the purpose of selling the format, but so defendant could decide whether he wanted to enter into a business relationship with plaintiff
  • the unsolicited submission of an idea to a potential employee or potential business partner, even if that person then passes the disclosed information to a competitor, results in no inference that a confidence or a confidential relationship has been created

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.