· 9/27/1979
Faris v. Enberg
Citations
- 97 Cal. App. 3d 309
- 158 Cal. Rptr. 704
- 211 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 277
- 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between a situation where 15 one voluntarily receives a confidential disclosure as opposed to receiving an unsolicited submission 16 of an idea
- upholding grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment on implied-in-fact contract claim
- “An actionable 14 breach of confidence will arise when an idea, whether or not protectable, is offered to another in 15 confidence.”
- plaintiff submitted his format for a sports-themed television quiz show to defendant, not for the purpose of selling the format, but so defendant could decide whether he wanted to enter into a business relationship with plaintiff
- the unsolicited submission of an idea to a potential employee or potential business partner, even if that person then passes the disclosed information to a competitor, results in no inference that a confidence or a confidential relationship has been created
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.