Farid v. Ellen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “personal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations” as “prerequisite to an award of damages under § 1983” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that personal involvement of defendants is a prerequisite for damages in § 1983 action
• considering whether rules under which inmate was disciplined were unconstitutionally vague
• “[T]he catch-all contraband rule allowed prison officials to determine in their unbounded discretion what was and was not” authorized in the facility.
• the plaintiff must allege that the defendant was directly or personally involved in the claimed constitutional deprivation
• “personal involvement of defendants in alleged constitutional deprivations is a prerequisite to an award of damages under § 1983”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).