Fargas v. Cincinnati Machine, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that report from Rule 35 examining physician who intends to testify at trial must be produced within timeline established for other Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures
• denying request for Rule 35 order where there was “ample medical evidence relating to Plaintiff’s PTSD”
• denying request for medical examination under Rule 35 because the request came five days before expert disclosure deadline
• discussing Rule 26’s purpose and burden on party when medical examination is necessary to form expert opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).