Fardig v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no “control” when only interaction between parties was “supervisory’ to determine “whether or not [the work was] being done in accordance with the contract”
• no \control\ when only interaction between parties was \supervisory\ to determine \whether or not [the work was] being done in accordance with the contract\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marquis v. City of Spokane
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-05· cited 245×
• Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-07-27· cited 150×
• Epperly v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-02-25· cited 96×
• Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-05-06· cited 86×
• Afoa v. Port of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 71×
• E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. Noland
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-03-19· cited 58×
• Dolan v. King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 2011-10-28· cited 52×
• DeWater v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-05· cited 50×
• Kennedy v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-09-16· cited 36×
• Hennig v. Crosby Group, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 33×
• Phillips v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-07-05· cited 33×
• Smith v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-13· cited 10×
• Franklin v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-10-13· cited 3×
• Pacific Inland Navigation Co., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-02-12
• Vargas v. Inland Washington, LLC
  Washington Supreme Court· 2019-11-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Larson v. American Bridge Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1905-09-20· cited 51×
• Cassidy v. Peters
  Washington Supreme Court· 1957-04-11· cited 8×